Skip to Content
SkillsAssessing and following skills

Assessing and following skills

Prerequisites: one active skill, plus either attached content or a planned milestone. Rights required: no back-office right lets you assess. Create skills and Update skills, in the Skill edition block, govern the framework; Skills Statistics governs reading. Assessing comes from the Coach and Team Leader roles, in a group's Roles tab. See Assigning roles in a group.

On this page

Assessing and following skills

Prerequisites: one active skill, plus either attached content or a planned milestone. Rights required: no back-office right lets you assess. Create skills and Update skills, in the Skill edition block, govern the framework; Skills Statistics governs reading. Assessing comes from the Coach and Team Leader roles, in a group’s Roles tab. See Assigning roles in a group.

The team leader’s screen is covered in Handing field assessment to the manager; this page covers the rest: the routes by which a level changes, what survives of each, and where it is read back.

The three routes that move a level

RouteWho triggers itWhereThe level that moves
A piece of content finishedNobody, it is automaticNo screenTheoretical
A milestone assessedA coachThe app, Coaching spaceCoach
A direct entryA team leaderThe app, My team tabManager

There is no fourth. The three sit side by side on the same skill and never overwrite one another.

The theoretical level

Content management → Skills, open a skill, Theoretical points tab. Points build up whenever a learner completes a capsule or a tip carrying that skill, and this tab sets how many points each level requires.

Content that carries a skill without an explicit point value counts for one point on that skill. Set a higher value on the content itself when a long capsule should weigh more than a short tip.

⚠️ Changing those thresholds does not recompute levels already awarded. The new rule applies only to points added afterwards.

The level a coach assigns

The coach opens the milestone in the app and starts Evaluate Milestone. The Milestone evaluation panel states the instruction: “To evaluate, assign a level to each skill.” Each row opens on Assign a level, with a slider and a reminder of the Learner’s level.

⚠️ A coach cannot lower a level. The panel states the rule directly: You can assign the current level or a higher one. The assessment is also final, Once confirmed, milestone validation cannot be changed, so check each row before confirming. This level, and only this one, awards a skill-based certificate.

Following over time

Every milestone assessment is dated and kept. It is the only one of the three routes with a history; the other two write a current value and nothing else, with no trace of the previous one. The history is read in Statistics → Learners / Groups → Learners: open a learner, the Statistics tab, then Skills. One curve per skill, one point per assessed milestone, plus a spreadsheet export. With no assessed milestone the curve stays empty, even if the theoretical level has moved.

What the learner sees

On their profile, Progress tab, the My skills section: up to three rows per skill, Theoretical, Manager and Coach, tagged by rank and name, “2 | Competent” for instance. See Mastery levels.

⚠️ A row at notch 0 is not displayed: a learner assessed at the bottom of the scale sees exactly what a learner never assessed sees.

What it does not do

No self-assessment. The learner reads their levels and enters none.

No assessment from the back-office. An administrator builds the framework, sets the thresholds and reads the results: they place nobody. It all happens in the app.

No reset. No expiry, no recertification, no way to delete a past assessment.

The trap

⚠️ The three averages in the statistics share no denominator.

  • Average level counts only learners with at least one completed milestone, and keeps the highest notch each of them reached;
  • Average theoretical level counts only those who finished at least one attached piece of content;
  • Average manager level counts only those a team leader actually scored.

Three adjacent columns, three different populations. An Average level of 4 over three coached learners does not compare with an Average theoretical level of 1.8 over six hundred: read Number of learners coached first. Average level is also rounded to a whole number and the other two to one decimal, so a gap smaller than one notch may be nothing but rounding.

💡 Redoing content already finished adds its points again. Points accumulate on the skill without being deduplicated per capsule or tip. On a skill with little content attached, that alone is enough to push the theoretical level up with nothing new learned.

Going further


Discutez avec nous